Category Archives: PAD 520

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 11 DQ 1 Process of Analysis and Structuring Arguments and DQ 2 Challenges Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 11 DQ 1 Process of Analysis and Structuring Arguments and DQ 2 Challenges Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-11-dq-1-process-of-analysis-and-structuring-arguments-and-dq-2-challenges-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 11 DQ 1 Process of Analysis and Structuring Arguments and DQ 2 Challenges Latest Guide

“Process of Analysis and Structuring Arguments” Please respond to the following:

Discuss at least two benefits to structuring arguments before and while developing written documents.

Highlight at least two concepts or skills of public policy analysis you learned in this class and that you believe you can apply in your current or future career.

Week 11 Discussion 2

“Challenges” Please respond to the following:

Discuss at least two major challenges you believe public policy analysts face in today’s political environment and propose at least one way to deal with each challenge.

Discuss at least two major challenges you believe public policy analysts will face in the next 10 to 20 years and propose at least one way to deal with each challenge.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 10 DQ 1 Planning Oral Briefings and DQ 2 White House Briefings Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 10 DQ 1 Planning Oral Briefings and DQ 2 White House Briefings Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-10-dq-1-planning-oral-briefings-and-dq-2-white-house-briefings-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 10 DQ 1 Planning Oral Briefings and DQ 2 White House Briefings Latest Guide

“Planning Oral Briefings” Please respond to the following:

Assume the governor has asked you to present an oral briefing on a controversial environmental program to a board of commissioners of a major county in the state. Three of the nine commissioners oppose the program and have experts on their staff who generally accompany them to meetings. Recommend three actions to take before the briefing and two key actions as you present the recommendation. Provide reasons to support your response.

Discuss at least two possible advantages and two possible disadvantages to using graphics and charts in oral briefings. Discuss the implications of these advantages and disadvantages to the one responsible for communicating public policy. Provide an example to support your response.

Week 10 Discussion 2

“White House Briefings” Please respond to the following:

From the e-Activity, summarize your first briefing. Based on your response to Discussion 1, discuss whether your recommendations were notable. Provide two to three examples to support your response.

From the e-Activity, compare and contrast the issues discussed in two briefings you selected. Take a position on which oral briefing closely matches your preferred style of communicating policy. Provide reasons to support your response.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 1 DQ 1 The Process of Analysis and DQ 2 Critical Thinking Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 1 DQ 1 The Process of Analysis and DQ 2 Critical Thinking Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-1-dq-1-the-process-of-analysis-and-dq-2-critical-thinking-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 1 DQ 1 The Process of Analysis and DQ 2 Critical Thinking Latest Guide

Week 1 discussion 1

“The Process of Analysis ? Diagrams and Trees” Please respond to the following:

 From the case study, Case 1.3, compare and contrast the benefits of the influence diagram and decision tree displayed in Figure C1.3. Explain why these two problem representations are good examples of descriptive and normative decision theory.

Refer to your first discussion’s answer and analyze the differences between monitoring and evaluation in policy analysis. Provide at least one example to support your response.

Week 1 discussion 2

“The Process of Analysis ? Critical Thinking” Please respond to the following:

From the case studies, Case 1.1 and Case 1.2, discuss the strengths and limitations of using multiple triangulation, also called critical multiplism. Provide at least one example to support your answer.

Propose two reasons argumentation mapping can help a policy maker become a critical thinker. Provide at least two examples to support your response.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 2 DQ 1 Developing Policy Arguments and Debate and DQ 2 Policy Arguments Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 2 DQ 1 Developing Policy Arguments and Debate and DQ 2 Policy Arguments Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-2-dq-1-developing-policy-arguments-and-debate-and-dq-2-policy-arguments-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 2 DQ 1 Developing Policy Arguments and Debate and DQ 2 Policy Arguments Latest Guide

Developing Policy Arguments and Debate” Please respond to the following:

Develop a policy argument or claim that is definitive, designative, evaluative, and advocative, using one of these terms: (a) crime, (b) pollution, (c) terrorism, (d) quality of life, (e) global warming, (f) fiscal crisis, (g) human rights, and (h) unemployment.

Convert the argument in the first discussion into a policy debate by providing an objection and a rebuttal. Explain if and why the qualifier changed after introducing an objection and rebuttal. If the qualifier did not change, explain why it did not change.

Week 2 Discussion 2

“Policy Arguments” Please respond to the following:

From the case study, Case 8.1, use the argument mapping procedures presented in the chapter and provide two pros and two cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendation that the United States should NOT intervene in the Balkans.

 From the e-Activity, discuss two different modes of argument and examples of formal and informal fallacies. Provide the source(s) of the modes of arguments and fallacies you identified.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 3 Assignment 1 Argument Mapping Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 3 Assignment 1 Argument Mapping Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-3-assignment-1-argument-mapping-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

PAD 520 Week 3 Assignment 1 Argument Mapping Latest Guide

PAD 520 Week 3 Assignment 1 Argument MappingAssignment 1: Argument Mapping

Due Week 3 and worth 150 points

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

(Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 1 for criteria 1-3.)

Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1.3 and complete all the criteria provided in the exercise, beginning with this claim: “The U.S. should return to the 55- mph speed limit in order to conserve fuel and save lives.”

Include in the map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as possible.

Assume that the original qualifier wascertainly; indicate whether the qualifier changes as we move from a simple, static, uncontested argument to a complex, dynamic and contested argument.

(Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criterion 4.)

 Apply the argument mapping procedures presented in Chapter 8 to analyze the pros and cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendations that the United States shouldnot intervene in the Balkans.

(Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 4 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criteria 5-7.)

Write a one (1) page analysis that uses critical thinking to assess the overall plausibility of the claim: “The conflict in Bosnia is somebody else’s trouble. The U.S. should not intervene militarily.”

Complete an argument map to illustrate your analysis.

Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views regarding the proposed U.S. response to the conflict in Bosnia.Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are not acceptable resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Use Microsoft Word, Microsoft Draw, PowerPoint, or other graphics program to create the arguments maps for the assignment. Whichever program you use, the graphical maps must be integrated into the Word Document and labeled as a Figure with a number and title. The argument maps are part of the page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze the historical context, basic concepts, strategies, and / or models of public policy.

Examine the nature, characteristics, models, and / or methods pertinent to the structuring of policy problems.

Examine the process of policy argument development.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in policy analysis and program evaluation.

Write clearly and concisely about policy analysis and program evaluation using proper writing mechanics.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 3 DQ 1 Policy-Making Process and DQ 2 Analysis in Practice Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 3 DQ 1 Policy-Making Process and DQ 2 Analysis in Practice Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-3-dq-1-policy-making-process-and-dq-2-analysis-in-practice-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 3 DQ 1 Policy-Making Process and DQ 2 Analysis in Practice Latest Guide

“Policy-Making Process” Please respond to the following:

Take a position in support of one of the two statements:

(a) Policy analysts should research the issues and determine the fundamental causes of social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness and then recommend solutions.

(b) Policy analysts should develop implementable policies to address social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness without research to determine the cause(s). Support your position with examples or evidence.

From the case study, Case 2.1, debate two pros and two cons of evidence-based policy making, by considering the concepts of “ technocratic guidance” and “technocratic counsel.”Week 3 Discussion 2

Analysis in Practice” Please respond to the following:

From the e-Activity, provide two reasons and / or examples of what makes the paper or report you selected of high technical quality. Provide the source(s) of the article you selected.

From the e-Activity, provide two examples from the same article that illustrate how the analysis changes the status quo.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 4 DQ 1 Structuring the Problem and DQ 2 Models and Structuring Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 4 DQ 1 Structuring the Problem and DQ 2 Models and Structuring Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-4-dq-1-structuring-the-problem-and-dq-2-models-and-structuring-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 4 DQ 1 Structuring the Problem and DQ 2 Models and Structuring Latest Guide

“Structuring the Problem” Please respond to the following:

Examine Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one (1) policy issue in the U.S. and generate a list of at least five (5) stakeholders who affect or are affected by problems in the issue area. Next, apply the procedures for a stakeholder analysis. Note: Refer to page 111 in the text for a step-by-step process.

From the e-Activity, provide at least two examples from the article and from your own experience of ways that worldviews, ideologies, and popular myths may have shaped the formulation of a specific problem or issue. Provide the source(s) of the paper or report you selected.

Week 4 Discussion 2

“Models and Structuring” Please respond to the following:

Review Question 6 and select one of the ill-structured problems taken from the journal Policy Analysis (now the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Under the title “Department of Unintended Consequences”. Analyze the problem; then, provide an example on how classification analysis, hierarchy analysis, and synectics might be used to structure the problem you selected. Identify the problem you selected in your discussion with one of the following key phrases: (a) Egyptian agriculture, (b) ecologists and field mice, (c) San Francisco’s North Beach parking.

From the case study, Case 3.1, analyze the problem; then, provide two key differences in data collection represented by the process of group interviewing and content analysis. Take a position on which data collection method is better. Provide at least two reasons for your position.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 Assignment 2 Stakeholder Analaysis Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 Assignment 2 Stakeholder Analaysis Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-5-assignment-2-stakeholder-analaysis-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

 PAD 520 Week 5 Assignment 2 Stakeholder Analaysis Latest Guide

Assignment 2: Stakeholder Analysis

Due Week 5 and worth 150 points

Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:

(Note: Refer to Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 1-3. Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as NewsWeek, Time, and The New Republic.)

Apply the procedures for argumentation analysis (located in Chapter 8) to display contending positions and underlying assumptions for the content of Review Question 8.

Rate the assumptions and plot them according to their plausibility and importance. (Refer to Figure 3.16, “Distribution of warrant by plausibility and importance.”)

Determine which arguments are the most plausible. Provide a rationale for your views.

 (Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 1 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 4-6. Examine Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one of the following policy issues in the U.S. gun control, illegal drugs, medical insurance fraud, and environmental protection of waterways, job creation, affordable health care, or Medicare.)

 Apply the procedures for stakeholder analysis presented in Box 3.0 “Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis” to generate a list of at least five to ten (5-10) stakeholders who affect or are affected by problems in the issue area chosen for analysis. (Note: Refer to page 111 of the textbook for a step-by-step process on stakeholder analysis.)

 After creating a cumulative frequency distribution from the list, discuss new ideas generated by each stakeholder. (Note:The ideas may be objectives, alternatives, outcomes causes, etc.; ideas should not be duplicates.)

 Write an analysis of the results of the frequency distribution that answers the following questions: (a) Does the line graph flatten out? (b) If so, after how many stakeholders? (c) What conclusions can be drawn about the policy problems in the issue area? (Note:Compare your work with Case Study 3.1 at the end of the chapter.)

Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views regarding the proposed U.S. response to the conflict in Bosnia.Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are not acceptable resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Examine the nature, characteristics, models, and / or methods pertinent to the structuring of policy problems.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in policy analysis and program evaluation.

Write clearly and concisely about policy analysis and program evaluation using proper writing mechanics.

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 DQ 1 Approaches to Forecasting Policy Outcomes Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 DQ 1 Approaches to Forecasting Policy Outcomes Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-5-dq-1-approaches-to-forecasting-policy-outcomes-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

PAD 520 Week 5 DQ 1 Approaches to Forecasting Policy Outcomes Latest Guide

“Approaches to Forecasting Policy Outcomes” Please respond to the following:

Explain at least two ways institutional, temporal, and historical contexts of forecasts affect their accuracy.

Describe a real or hypothetical situation that requires someone to make a policy decision. Then, select one of the three approaches to forecasting to apply: extrapolative, theoretical, or judgmental. Provide at least two reasons for your selection of the forecasting approach.

 

 

 

 

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 Week 5 DQ 2 Types of Forecasting Latest Guide

STRAYER PAD 520 Week 5 Week 5 DQ 2 Types of Forecasting Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/pad-520-strayer/pad-520-week-5-week-5-dq-2-types-of-forecasting-latest-guide

 For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com

PAD 520 Week 5 Week 5 DQ 2 Types of Forecasting Latest Guide

Week 5 Discussion 2

“Types of Forecasting” Please respond to the following:

Debate It: Take a position for or against this statement: It is better to be approximately right than exactly wrong. Provide at least two reasons and one hypothetical example to support your position.