Category Archives: PSY 303 (ASH)

ASH PSY 303 Entire Course Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Entire Course Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-entire-course-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Entire Course Latest Guide

PSY 303 Week 1 Assignment Taking the Patient’s History

PSY 303 Week 1 Discussion Controversy Agree On A Definition Of Abnormal

PSY 303 Week 1 Journal Your Personal Attitudes Toward Psychopathology

PSY 303 Week 2 Assignment Taking The Patient’s History

PSY 303 Week 2 Discussion Controversy Evaluating Media’s Accuracy

PSY 303 Week 2 Journal Responding To Bias And Prejudice Toward Psychopathology

PSY 303 Week 3 Assignment Gathering Collateral Information

PSY 303 Week 3 Discussion Controversy Gender Dysphoria Should It Be In The Dsm-5?

PSY 303 Week 3 Journal Questionable Treatment Practices In Psychology

PSY 303 Week 4 Discussion Controversy Culturally Bound Syndromes And Symptoms

PSY 303 Week 4 Journal The Subjectivity And Art Of Diagnosis

PSY 303 Week 5 Discussion Controversy The Role Of Big Pharma

PSY 303 Week 5 Final Paper Psychological Report

PSY 303 Week 5 Journal Synthesizing The Week’s Controversy

ASH PSY 303 Week 1 Discussion Controversy Agree On A Definition Of Abnormal Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 1 Discussion Controversy Agree On A Definition Of Abnormal Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-1-discussion-controversy-agree-on-a-definition-of-abnormal-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 1 Discussion Controversy Agree On A Definition Of Abnormal Latest Guide

Controversy: Agree on a Definition of Abnormal. You must successfully complete the “Neurodevelopmental Disorders and the History of Abnormal Psychology” quiz before you will be allowed to post in this discussion forum. Before working on this discussion, please read Chapter 1 in the course text, the articles by Szasz (1960) and Ausubel (1961), and review any Instructor Guidance.

For this discussion, you will enter into a dialogue regarding a classic and ongoing controversy within abnormal psychology. Specifically, what is the definition of abnormal psychology?

As you enter into the conversation, provide your definition of abnormal psychology. Relate historical events that influenced your thought process as you created your definition. Identify a major theoretical perspective that closely matches your definition. What diagnoses come to mind when defining abnormal psychology?

Your challenge, as a class, is to come to a collective agreement on a definition for abnormal psychology. The goal of this discussion is to have a single dynamic and respectful conversation about the definition, not a series of 20 to 30 separate conversations. This means that every post should be in response to another post. Your instructor will be posting the initial thread to which you will respond. Only start a new discussion thread if you want to address an entirely different theme or question(s) within the discussion subject area. Additionally, only post after first carefully reading what all the others within the thread have written.

A simple agree or disagree statement is insufficient to be counted as a response. When presenting your opinion, cite relevant sources (beyond your text) to support your statements. Do not repeat what your classmates have already written, and do not ignore them if they ask you questions. Any questions asked of you must be answered, including questions from your instructor. Try to keep the conversation moving forward by presenting options, insights, alternative ideas on and/or interpretations of the topics and research.

You must post a response within the discussion on at least three separate days by Day 7, and your posts must total at least 800 words. There is no required word count for individual posts as long as your posts together total at least 800 words. There is no maximum number of posts for any discussion.

Once your discussion is graded, your instructor will provide you with a summary of the week’s discussion and any conclusions or definitions that the class agreed on in your grading feedback. Please keep this summary in mind for future discussions in this course.

ASH PSY 303 Week 1 Journal Silver Linings Playbook Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 1 Journal Silver Linings Playbook Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-1-journal-silver-linings-playbook-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

 PSY 303 Week 1 Journal Silver Linings Playbook Latest Guide

Your Personal Attitudes Toward Psychopathology. For this journal, you have two tasks:

Task 1: Indicate which character or historical figure you will investigate for your Week Two assignment, Week Three assignment, and your Final Paper. The character must be the same for each assignment, and you may not alter your choice after the conclusion of Week Two.

Review this list of movies or this list of historical case studies that are approved for use for this assignment (these are available in your online classroom). You must choose from the provided lists.

Task 2: This week’s discussion forum and readings may have triggered some personal thoughts and feelings regarding abnormal psychology. One of the most important aspects of developing competence in abnormal psychology is to be honestly and completely aware of your personal attitudes toward people who have mental health conditions.

This 250- to 500-word journal entry is an opportunity for you to honestly reflect on your thoughts regarding abnormal psychology. For instance, what insights on bias or prejudice does this topic raise? What potential perception issues or conflicts between belief systems and knowledge sets might arise? Consider any other questions that came up for you over the course of this week’s assignments. You may share as much or as little as you wish, as long as it is evident in your journal that you have taken the time to reflect.

This journal does not require you to share personal information about your mental health or the mental health of people you know. Psychology instructors cannot ask students to divulge this kind of information for grading. For further information see Standard 7.04 in the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.

Your journal will be graded based on whether or not you provided a substantial and thoughtful entry.

 

ASH PSY 303 Week 1 Assignment Taking the Patient’s History Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/-psy-303-week-1-assignment-taking-the-patient’s-history-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 1 Assignment Taking the Patient’s History Latest Guide

PSY 303 Week 1 Assignment Taking the Patient’s History

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Journal Responding To Bias And Prejudice Toward Psychopathology Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Journal Responding To Bias And Prejudice Toward Psychopathology Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-2-journal-responding-to-bias-and-prejudice-toward-psychopathology-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 2 Journal Responding To Bias And Prejudice Toward Psychopathology Latest Guide

Responding to Bias and Prejudice Toward Psychopathology. In last week’s journal, you honestly reflected on your thoughts regarding abnormal psychology. Through that reflection, you may have recognized that you have some biases or prejudices toward specific groups of people. Recognizing any possible biases and prejudices is an essential step toward becoming a scholar of psychology. Taking reasonable steps toward resolving those biases and prejudices is a significant opportunity for personal growth and professional development.

This 250- to 500-word journal entry is an opportunity for you to describe ways that you might go about resolving any biases and prejudices within yourself. Alternatively, you may want to write about how you will respond to bias and prejudice you might encounter in your everyday life.

For instance, what kinds of education or experiences might help you address bias and prejudice within yourself? How might you respond to a person who thinks that people with mental health conditions should be locked away in institutions and never allowed to rejoin society? What kind of education might you provide to a person who believes that Autism is due to poor parenting? What resources might you draw from to support healthy, accurate, and research-supported views regarding psychopathology? What available resources might you point people to who need more information on specific

issues? If you have any favorite websites or web resources, please add entries for those into the Webliography for this course.

Consider any other questions that came up for you over the course of this week’s activities. You may share as much or as little as you wish, as long as it is evident in your journal that you have taken the time to reflect.

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Assignment Taking The Patient’s History Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Assignment Taking The Patient’s History Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-2-assignment-taking-the-patient%E2%80%99s-history-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 2 Assignment Taking The Patient’s History Latest Guide

Taking the Patient’s History. Each assignment in this course will help you prepare your Final Paper. For each assignment, you will use the movie character or historical figure you chose in your Week One journal. Remember, after submitting this week’s assignment, you will not be allowed to change your movie character or historical figure.

One of the first steps in any clinical assessment is to gather a thorough history from the patient. This history includes, at minimum, the patient’s identifying information, presenting problem, and relevant personal history relating to their presenting problem.

For this assignment, you will write the first few sections of your psychological report. View the complete instructions for the Final Paper in the link within Week Five of your online course or the “Components of Course Evaluation” section of this guide. This week, your assignment must cover the following sections of your psychological report and include the headings as listed:

1. Identifying Information

Within this section, you will record basic information on your patient, including the person’s name, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, race, occupation, and location of residence (country, state, region).

2.Chief Complaint/Presenting Problem

Within this section you will include the patient’s primary complaint verbatim to identify the main source of his or her distress and/or concerns. If there is no verbatim complaint, include observable information to create an overall picture of the presenting problem.

Typically, this section within a psychological report seeks to answer the following question (further elaboration within this section is encouraged where possible):

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Discussion Controversy Evaluating Media’s Accuracy Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 2 Discussion Controversy Evaluating Media’s Accuracy Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-2-discussion-controversy-evaluating-media%E2%80%99s-accuracy-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 2 Discussion Controversy Evaluating Media’s Accuracy Latest Guide

Controversy: Evaluating Media’s Accuracy. You must successfully complete the “Mood and Personality Disorders” quiz before you will be allowed to post in this discussion forum. Before working on this discussion, please read Chapters 6 and 9 in the course text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance.

For this discussion, you will enter into a dialogue on another ongoing controversy and contemporary issue regarding abnormal psychology. Specifically, how accurate are the various media representations of psychopathology?

As you enter into this conversation, analyze depictions of the identification and treatment of abnormal behavior in media sources. Then take a moment to consider and comment on the consequences of accurate and inaccurate depictions of mental health conditions in popular media. Identify at least one theoretical perspective (e.g., biological, cognitive, psychodynamic) from the literature that informs your observations. Additionally, you should integrate information on how media shapes our cultural expectations and norms with respect to abnormal/maladaptive behavior. Be sure to utilize fundamental concepts for the ethical application of psychology from Standards 2.04 and 5.04 of the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct as you create your responses.

If you chose to write about a movie character for your psychological report, you are welcome to include your evaluation of that movie’s depiction of psychopathology in this discussion forum. However, your evaluation alone will not suffice in the completion of this discussion.

Again, the goal of this discussion forum is to have a single dynamic and respectful conversation about how psychopathology is represented in the media and the consequences of those representations, not a series of 20 to 30 separate conversations. This means that every post should be in response to another post. Your instructor will be posting the initial thread to which you will respond. Only start a new discussion thread if you want to address an entirely different theme or question(s) within the discussion subject area. Additionally, only post after first carefully reading what all the thers within the thread have written.

A simple agree or disagree statement is insufficient to be counted as a response. When presenting your opinion, cite relevant sources (beyond your text) to support your statements. Do not repeat what your classmates have already written, and do not ignore them if they ask you questions. Any questions asked of you must be answered, including questions from your instructor. Try to keep the conversation moving forward by presenting options, insights, alternative ideas on and/or interpretations of the topics and research.

You must post a response within the discussion on at least three separate days by Day 7, and your posts must total at least 800 words. There is no required word count for individual posts as long as your posts together total at least 800 words. There is no maximum number of posts for any discussion.

Once your discussion is graded, your instructor will provide you with a summary of the week’s discussion and any conclusions or definitions that the class agreed on in your grading feedback. Please keep this summary in mind for future discussions in this course.

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Assignment Gathering Collateral Information Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Assignment Gathering Collateral Information Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-3-assignment-gathering-collateral-information-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 3 Assignment Gathering Collateral Information Latest Guide

Gathering Collateral Information. Each assignment in this course will help you prepare your Final Paper. For all assignments, you will use the movie character or historical figure that you used in your Week Two assignment and selected in your Week One journal.

After gathering your patient’s history, it is considered good practice to contact people who interact with the patient on a regular basis and/or are related to the patient. These people often provide valuable insights into the patient’s behavior(s) and mindset. Typically, the gathered information provides a context for the patient’s environment.

For this assignment, you will write another section of your Final Paper. View the complete instructions for the Final Paper in the link within Week Five of your online course or the “Components of Course Evaluation” section of this guide.

Your assignment this week must cover the following section of your psychological report and include the heading aslisted:

IX. Collateral

Within this section, you will interpret specific collateral information as it relates to your patient’s abnormal behavior and behavior patterns. You will also integrate information and knowledge regarding the patient’s culture in your evaluation of the maladaptive behavior as reported by the collateral sources.

Typically, this section within a psychological report seeks to answer the following questions (further elaboration within this section is encouraged where possible):

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Discussion Controversy Gender Dysphoria Should It Be In The DSM 5? Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Discussion Controversy Gender Dysphoria Should It Be In The DSM 5? Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-3-discussion-controversy-gender-dysphoria-should-it-be-in-the-dsm-5-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 3 Discussion Controversy Gender Dysphoria Should It Be In The DSM 5? Latest Guide

Controversy: Gender Dysphoria Should It Be in the DSM 5? You must successfully complete the “Stress, Trauma, SexuaL

Dysfunctions, Paraphilic Disorders, and Gender Dysphoria Disorders” quiz before you will be allowed to post in this discussion forum. Before working on this discussion, please read Chapter 12 in the course text, the article by Kamens (2011), watch the Beyond the Gender Binary: Yee Won Chong at TEDxRainier video, and review any relevant Instructor Guidance.

For this discussion, you will enter into a conversation on another ongoing controversy and contemporary issue regarding abnormal psychology. Specifically, should gender dysphoria be included as a diagnosis in the DSM-5? It is absolutely essential that you view the required video and read the required article and your instructor’s initial post before participating in this discussion.

As you enter into this conversation, carefully consider the historical information you read regarding the rationale behind excluding the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of gender identity disorder from the DSM-5. Then, take a moment to relate this historical background to the current ethical, clinical, and social controversies regarding gender dysphoria and the DSM-5. Analyze this controversy within the context of how clinicians ethically identify and treat psychiatric conditions. Be sure to integrate knowledge of any appropriate cultural considerations psychologist must be aware of when diagnosing gender dysphoria.

Again, the goal of this discussion forum is to have a single dynamic and respectful conversation about the inclusion of gender dysphoria as a diagnosable condition in the DSM-5, not a series of 20 to 30 separate conversations. This means that every post should be in response to another post. Your instructor will be posting the initial thread to which you will respond. Only start a new discussion thread if you want to address an entirely different theme or question(s) within the discussion subject area. Additionally, only post after first carefully reading what all the others within the thread have written.

A simple agree or disagree statement is insufficient to be counted as a response. When presenting your opinion, cite relevant sources (beyond your text) to support your statements. Do not repeat what your classmates have already written, and do not ignore them if they ask you questions. Any questions asked of you must be answered, including questions from your instructor. Try to keep the conversation moving forward by presenting options, insights, alternative ideas on and/or interpretations of the topics and research.

You must post a response within the discussion on at least three separate days by Day 7, and your posts must total at least 800 words. There is no required word count for individual posts as long as your posts together total at least 800 words. There is no maximum number of posts for any discussion.

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Journal Questionable Treatment Practices In Psychology Latest Guide

ASH PSY 303 Week 3 Journal Questionable Treatment Practices In Psychology Latest Guide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopmaterials.com/psy-303-ash/psy-303-week-3-journal-questionable-treatment-practices-in-psychology-latest-guide

For more classes visit

http://www.uopmaterials.com/

PSY 303 Week 3 Journal Questionable Treatment Practices In Psychology Latest Guide

Questionable Treatment Practices in Psychology. This week’s discussion touched on changes in perception regarding psychopathology in response to shifts in societal attitudes toward specific behaviors. Now, let us look critically at treatments in general. A number of treatments for currently diagnosable disorders have been discontinued, such as trepanning and lobotomies, because they were discredited and are now considered crude and/or barbaric. A number of disorders have been completely removed from diagnostic manuals and their corresponding treatments have been discredited and discontinued. For example, the treatment known as conversion therapy or reparative therapy for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals is known to be ineffective and even harmful.

In this 250- to 500-word journal entry, you will consider current treatment methods (e.g., electroconvulsive therapy, exposure, and response prevention). Choose a current treatment method and comment on what ways future researchers might consider this current treatment barbaric or crude. Explain why you chose to comment on this treatment. What would need to happen for current acceptance of this treatment procedure to change? What are the ethical implications involved in using a questionable treatment option?

Consider any other questions that came up for you over the course of this week’s assignments. You may share as much or as little as you wish, as long as it is evident in your journal that you have taken the time to reflect.

Your journal will be graded based on whether or not you provided a substantial and thoughtful entry.